desidas
01-23 08:41 PM
Folks,
We move and my wife and I did an online AR11 and ONLINE I-485 Mailing address change using USCIS website yesterday.
My wife got an automatic email confirmation that her I-485 Mailing Address is changed and we even see the LUD is changed as well
but I didnot get any email confirmation of the address change of I-485 neither I see any LUD change.
1. What should I do? Call CIS?
2. How long does it take to update Mailing Address on I-485 when changing the mailing address online after Online AR-11 submission?
Please advise
We move and my wife and I did an online AR11 and ONLINE I-485 Mailing address change using USCIS website yesterday.
My wife got an automatic email confirmation that her I-485 Mailing Address is changed and we even see the LUD is changed as well
but I didnot get any email confirmation of the address change of I-485 neither I see any LUD change.
1. What should I do? Call CIS?
2. How long does it take to update Mailing Address on I-485 when changing the mailing address online after Online AR-11 submission?
Please advise
wallpaper shoulder length wavy
needb2
03-10 05:52 PM
Hello,
I e-filed my AP on March 4th ( this was my 2nd AP application; the first one was paper file in July 2007)
When i check the case status online it gives me a message "your case can not be found".
Any idea what it might be?
I tried several time calling the 1-800 service number but I am not getting to talk to a real person.
Thanks
I e-filed my AP on March 4th ( this was my 2nd AP application; the first one was paper file in July 2007)
When i check the case status online it gives me a message "your case can not be found".
Any idea what it might be?
I tried several time calling the 1-800 service number but I am not getting to talk to a real person.
Thanks
aa4dah8saa
12-10 08:33 PM
Whatever your priority date and who applied for you ( was it your brother/sister?) is what you will be checking whether they are checking your case yet or not. Here is the web and look at the latest month Visa Bulletin (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html)
I am doing 245i myself. I send I485 for AOS in late Sept, 2010. Had fingerprints done on Nov 3rd. I haven't heard anything from them since October so I dont know if everything is okay.
I am doing 245i myself. I send I485 for AOS in late Sept, 2010. Had fingerprints done on Nov 3rd. I haven't heard anything from them since October so I dont know if everything is okay.
2011 brunette with medium length
Jaime
09-21 11:18 PM
谢谢! for coming and 我们来自许多国家不仅印度!
Chinese friends! Please post ideas on how to increase the Chinese membership at IV and how to engage our dear Chinese members! You are SO VITAL!!!! Let's all work together! What are your ideas?
Chinese friends! Please post ideas on how to increase the Chinese membership at IV and how to engage our dear Chinese members! You are SO VITAL!!!! Let's all work together! What are your ideas?
more...
martinvisalaw
03-18 03:57 PM
Yes. The petition will be like a regular change of employer H-1B petition. The lawyers will tell you what documents they need from you when filing the company's H-1B petition.
brij523
03-01 04:52 PM
Friend Paskal is very much right. Also if associates don't want to come in front that is fine. Just find leads and let IV CORE take care from there.
Let me repeate TIME IS NOW.
Let me repeate TIME IS NOW.
more...
Kale
03-15 04:16 AM
this link is not working ..Do you have another ?
2010 shoulder length straight
stefanv
07-01 08:41 AM
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/9662/tdcfireworkstemplate1.jpgSomthing I did really quickly during break :D
more...
nomi
12-28 03:58 PM
Hi , My wife is on h4 visa and I want to file H1B for her and she has It experience of 3 years .Please guide whats the procedure .
It should be same the way you get your H1 visa.
It should be same the way you get your H1 visa.
hair Medium Length Straight
Macaca
06-12 07:33 AM
The System at Work (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/11/AR2007061101859.html) By E. J. Dionne Jr. (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/e.+j.+dionne+jr./) (postchat@aol.com), Tuesday, June 12, 2007
We have become political hypochondriacs. We seem eager to declare that "the system" has come down with some dread disease, to proclaim that an ideological "center" blessed by the heavens no longer exists, and woe unto us. An imperfect immigration bill is pulled from the Senate floor, and you'd think the Capitol dome had caved in.
It's all nonsense, but it is not harmless nonsense. The tendency to blame the system is a convenient way of leaving no one accountable. Those who offer this argument can sound sage without having to grapple with the specifics of any piece of legislation. There is the unspoken assumption that wisdom always lies in the political middle, no matter how unsavory the recipe served up by a given group of self-proclaimed centrists might be.
And when Republicans and Democrats are battling each other with particular ferocity, there is always a call for the appearance of an above-the-battle savior who will seize the presidency as an independent. This messiah, it is said, will transcend such "petty" concerns as philosophy or ideology.
Finally, those who attack the system don't actually want to change it much. For example, there's a very good case for abolishing the U.S. Senate. It often distorts the popular will since senators representing 18 percent of the population can cast a majority of the Senate's votes. And as Sen. John McCain said over the weekend, "The Senate works in a way that relatively small numbers can block legislation."
But many of the system-blamers in fact love Senate rules that, in principle, push senators toward the middle in seeking solutions. So they actually like the system more than they let on.
As it happens, I wish the immigration bill's supporters had gotten it through -- not because I think this is great legislation but because some bill has to get out of the Senate so real discussions on a final proposal can begin.
Notice how tepid that paragraph is. The truth is that most supporters of this bill find a lot of things in it they don't like. The guest-worker program, in particular, strikes me as terribly flawed. The bill's opponents, on the other hand, absolutely hate it because they see it as an effective amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants. And, boy, did those opponents mobilize. In well-functioning democracies, mobilized minorities often defeat unenthusiastic majorities.
And some "centrist" compromises are more coherent and politically salable than others. Neither side on the immigration issue has the popular support to get exactly what it wants. So a bill aimed at creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is full of grudging concessions to the anti-immigration side. These have the effect of demobilizing the very groups that support the underlying principles of this bill. That's not a system problem. It just happens that immigration is a hard issue that arouses real passion.
Typically, advocates of the system-breakdown theory move quickly from immigration to the failure of President Bush's Social Security proposals. Why, they ask, can't the system "fix" entitlements?
The simple truth is that a majority of Americans (I'm one of them) came to oppose Bush's privatization ideas. That reflected both a principled stand and a practical judgment. From our perspective, a proposal to cut benefits and create private accounts was radical, not centrist.
An authentically "centrist" solution to this problem would involve some modest benefit cuts and some modest tax increases. It will happen someday. But for now, conservatives don't want to support any tax increases. I think the conservatives are wrong, and they'd argue that they're principled. What we have here is a political disagreement, not a system problem. We have these things called elections to settle political disagreements.
Is Washington a mess? In many ways it is. The simplest explanation has to do with some bad choices made by President Bush. He started a misguided war that is now sapping his influence; he has treated Democrats as if they were infected with tuberculosis and Republicans in Congress as if they were his valets. No wonder he's having trouble pushing through a bill whose main opponents are his own ideological allies.
Maybe you would place blame elsewhere. But please identify some real people or real political forces and not just some faceless entity that you call the system. Please be specific, bearing in mind that when hypochondriacs misdiagnose vague ailments they don't have, they often miss the real ones.
We have become political hypochondriacs. We seem eager to declare that "the system" has come down with some dread disease, to proclaim that an ideological "center" blessed by the heavens no longer exists, and woe unto us. An imperfect immigration bill is pulled from the Senate floor, and you'd think the Capitol dome had caved in.
It's all nonsense, but it is not harmless nonsense. The tendency to blame the system is a convenient way of leaving no one accountable. Those who offer this argument can sound sage without having to grapple with the specifics of any piece of legislation. There is the unspoken assumption that wisdom always lies in the political middle, no matter how unsavory the recipe served up by a given group of self-proclaimed centrists might be.
And when Republicans and Democrats are battling each other with particular ferocity, there is always a call for the appearance of an above-the-battle savior who will seize the presidency as an independent. This messiah, it is said, will transcend such "petty" concerns as philosophy or ideology.
Finally, those who attack the system don't actually want to change it much. For example, there's a very good case for abolishing the U.S. Senate. It often distorts the popular will since senators representing 18 percent of the population can cast a majority of the Senate's votes. And as Sen. John McCain said over the weekend, "The Senate works in a way that relatively small numbers can block legislation."
But many of the system-blamers in fact love Senate rules that, in principle, push senators toward the middle in seeking solutions. So they actually like the system more than they let on.
As it happens, I wish the immigration bill's supporters had gotten it through -- not because I think this is great legislation but because some bill has to get out of the Senate so real discussions on a final proposal can begin.
Notice how tepid that paragraph is. The truth is that most supporters of this bill find a lot of things in it they don't like. The guest-worker program, in particular, strikes me as terribly flawed. The bill's opponents, on the other hand, absolutely hate it because they see it as an effective amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants. And, boy, did those opponents mobilize. In well-functioning democracies, mobilized minorities often defeat unenthusiastic majorities.
And some "centrist" compromises are more coherent and politically salable than others. Neither side on the immigration issue has the popular support to get exactly what it wants. So a bill aimed at creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is full of grudging concessions to the anti-immigration side. These have the effect of demobilizing the very groups that support the underlying principles of this bill. That's not a system problem. It just happens that immigration is a hard issue that arouses real passion.
Typically, advocates of the system-breakdown theory move quickly from immigration to the failure of President Bush's Social Security proposals. Why, they ask, can't the system "fix" entitlements?
The simple truth is that a majority of Americans (I'm one of them) came to oppose Bush's privatization ideas. That reflected both a principled stand and a practical judgment. From our perspective, a proposal to cut benefits and create private accounts was radical, not centrist.
An authentically "centrist" solution to this problem would involve some modest benefit cuts and some modest tax increases. It will happen someday. But for now, conservatives don't want to support any tax increases. I think the conservatives are wrong, and they'd argue that they're principled. What we have here is a political disagreement, not a system problem. We have these things called elections to settle political disagreements.
Is Washington a mess? In many ways it is. The simplest explanation has to do with some bad choices made by President Bush. He started a misguided war that is now sapping his influence; he has treated Democrats as if they were infected with tuberculosis and Republicans in Congress as if they were his valets. No wonder he's having trouble pushing through a bill whose main opponents are his own ideological allies.
Maybe you would place blame elsewhere. But please identify some real people or real political forces and not just some faceless entity that you call the system. Please be specific, bearing in mind that when hypochondriacs misdiagnose vague ailments they don't have, they often miss the real ones.
more...
raj1808
04-28 02:17 PM
Hello,
1. I last entered US in Dec 2009 on H1B valid till Sep 2012.
2. Was laid off, changed my status to F1.
3. Got new employer, transferred my H1B to the new employer, got approval notice with no I 94 attached. My H1B visa stamping is valid till Sep 2012.
What are my options? Do I need new H1B visa stamping? Or just re enter with new I94?
Thanks
1. I last entered US in Dec 2009 on H1B valid till Sep 2012.
2. Was laid off, changed my status to F1.
3. Got new employer, transferred my H1B to the new employer, got approval notice with no I 94 attached. My H1B visa stamping is valid till Sep 2012.
What are my options? Do I need new H1B visa stamping? Or just re enter with new I94?
Thanks
hot Medium Length Straight
rrajendra
08-05 04:11 PM
The expiry date of B1/B2 is printed on the visa. Getting F1 does not invalidate B1/B2. Unless the visa issuer put a stamp on the B1/B2 as "Cancelled", it is still valid!
more...
house Long Wavy Hairstyles for Women
Blog Feeds
10-01 03:50 PM
The Senate approved a stop-gap spending bill that will allow the Department of Homeland Security to operate until the end of October while House and Senate conferees try to work out a final version of the agency's spending bill. The measure now goes to President Obama who is expected to sign the bill. ANd none to soon since the agency's funding will run out tonight at midnight. The bill also extends four major immigration program - the Conrad 30 J-1 program for doctors, the religious workers program, E-Verify and the EB-5 investor visa. Why are the two houses of Congress...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/dhs-gets-funds-to-operate-another-month.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/dhs-gets-funds-to-operate-another-month.html)
tattoo woman with straight medium
srikondoji
12-07 07:31 PM
However, this was resolved and civil nuclear bill will go ahead for final approval in another 2 days.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1861966,001301790001.htm
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1861966,001301790001.htm
more...
pictures medium – long haircuts
ivar
02-09 10:40 PM
Immigration Trackers for USA Canada UK Australia (http://www..com)
dresses Halle Berry Medium Length
pappu
09-14 04:40 PM
Please visit the forums this weekend
We may have more info, updates or announcements. So visit IV site frequently. We know we will post some information on Sunday.
We may have more info, updates or announcements. So visit IV site frequently. We know we will post some information on Sunday.
more...
makeup medium hairstyles
txh1b
08-22 10:54 AM
Not necessarily an RFE. Read the hundreds of posts on pre-adjudication.
girlfriend Shoulder Length Straight
felix31
07-24 04:59 PM
Friends,
Need quick help!
Per old instructions everyone was sending to Nebraska, and new instructions published are for 'direct filing'.
Do I follow direct filing rule or Nebraska only rule?
I am finally ready with medicals and photos and will be sending packet tomorrow.
Thanks for help..
Need quick help!
Per old instructions everyone was sending to Nebraska, and new instructions published are for 'direct filing'.
Do I follow direct filing rule or Nebraska only rule?
I am finally ready with medicals and photos and will be sending packet tomorrow.
Thanks for help..
hairstyles shoulder length wavy
akred
08-19 05:05 PM
They must have made a mistake.
senk1s
10-24 08:20 PM
I've got some questions/comment to understand your situation
1. How do you know it is stuck in security check? What is your attorney's suggestion
For regular EB applications you can apply for 485 when priority date is current
2. EAD is generally adjudicated within 90 days
3. She should have a visa of her own - if she cannot be your dependant
1. How do you know it is stuck in security check? What is your attorney's suggestion
For regular EB applications you can apply for 485 when priority date is current
2. EAD is generally adjudicated within 90 days
3. She should have a visa of her own - if she cannot be your dependant
Blog Feeds
02-01 08:30 AM
The Government Accountability Office has released a new report studying the accuracy of the E-Verify database. According to the report, the number of tentative non-confirmations has decreased by 5% over the last two years, an indicator that the system has more complete records than in the past. The report also praised USCIS for instituting new measures to protect the privacy of employees and improve oversight of employers proper use of the system. But the report has also raised concerns as well. The report concluded that false tentative non-confirmations are more likely to relate to foreign-born employees which could lead to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/gao-report-discusses-state-of-e-verify.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/gao-report-discusses-state-of-e-verify.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment